Skip to main content
Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo

Full text of "The Hubble diagram of high redshift objects, QSOs and AGNs"

See other formats


m 



The Hubble diagram of high redshift objects, QSOs and AGNs 

C E. Navia, C R. A. Augusto, and K. H. Tsui 
Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil 24210-130 

-Q^-, ABSTRACT 

O 
O 
^ I According to the Hubble law, high redshift objects such as Quasar (QSOs), X- 

ray Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) together with the Gamma Ray Burst (GRBs) 
are the fastest and farthest objects. These characteristics provides strong mo- 
tivations for they to be used to constrain the cosmological parameters, without 
(-H ■ the limitations found in the la supernovae study and which is restricted to red- 

Ph' shift of up to 1.7. However, the variability and behavior in the QSOs and AGNs 

O ■ spectra tell us that they have very complex structures and the standard candle 

^ • framework can not be applied. So far the available data of QSOs and AGNs have 

^ ■ shown some anomalies observed in their brightness and metallicities, difficult to 

understand, under an orthodox point of view. Here, we show that their Hubble 
^ ' diagram flattens for 2 > 3. The result need further confirmation, because the 

^ ■ statistics of high redshift extragalactic objects is still poor. Details and some 

>/^ ■ implications of these results are reported in this work. 

O ■ Subject headings: gamma rays: burst — quasars: general — cosmology: phe- 

00 ■ 

O 



c^ 



nomenology 



X 

H ' 1. Introduction 



The quasars (QSOs) were discovered by radio telescopes in the late 1950s. Many were 
recorded as radio sources with no corresponding visible object. It is believed that the QSOs 
are extremely bright and distant active galactic nuclei (AGN) of young galaxies. They were 
first identified as being high-redshift sources of electromagnetic energy, including radio waves 
and visible light that were point-like. More than 60,000 quasars are known, all observed 
spectra have shown considerable redshifts, ranging from 0.06 to the recent maximum of 6.4. 
Quasars are found to vary in luminosity on a variety of time scales. The Sloan Digital Survey 
has uncovered the most distant quasars known (up to z ^ 6.4). In addition, there is also 
the report of high redshift X-ray AGNs with moderate to high quality spectra observed by 
XMM-Newton and Chandra. 



-2- 



On the other hand, a study made by Gehren et al (JGehren et aLl Il984l ) has shown 
that quasars are usually located in groups or clusters of galaxies which are dominated by 
the luminosity contribution of the quasar host galaxy. It is suggested that most radio-loud 
quasars are situated in giant elliptical galaxies in which a considerable amount of hot gas and 
young stars may be present owing to recent collisions or tidal interaction with nearby cluster 
members . In addition, fro m a study of pairs of quasars and galaxies, which were very close in 
the sky, (IStockton Ill978l ) found that, in a fraction (~ 50%) of the sample of quasar-galaxy, 
the redshifts of the galaxies agreed with the redshifts of the quasars. In other words, quasars 
are associated with galaxies that have the same redshift as the quasar, and have just the 
brightness expected, if the quasars are at their cosmological distances. However, according 
to the standard cosmology, the study can include only quasars at low or moderate redshifts, 
because the (1 + z)~^ dimming in s urface brightness makes normal galaxies unobservable at 
large redshifts (JLehnert et al.lll992l ). 



However, if the quasar-galaxy pair has different redshifts {zq > zq), just as it happens in 



70 of the St ockton's sample, the situation becomes controversial. Burbidge and cowork- 
ers have shown (JBurbidge et al.lll990l ) that there is strong evidence that normal galaxies and 
QSOs tend to clustered, whether or not their redshifts are the same. While if the quasar 
redshift is a distance indicator, as is advocated by the standard cosmology, the identification 
of quasars shining through or close to galaxies offer a way to probe gravitational lensing 
effects. From quasar-galaxy gravitational lensing, is possible to deduce that in some quasar- 
galaxy pairs with very different redshifts, the association is only apparent. Despite the small 
angular separation between the quasar and its galaxy companion, the quas ar must be beyond 
the lens galaxy. The method works only for galaxy lenses, with z > 0.5 (JDar Ill99ll ). How- 
ever, a more accurate analysis on gravitational lensing effect shows that gravitational lens 
measurements can be a powerful tool, but only if a variety of major difficulties are overcome, 
such as the multiple len ses and microlen sing background and the small variability amplitude 
typical of most quasar (ISchechter II2004I ). 



In this paper, we have made an analysis on the Hubble diagram of extragalactic high-z 
objects (QSOs and AGNs), on the basis of the more recent data as possible. This paper is 
organized as follows: In Sec. 2, extra galactic objects such as QSOs and AGNs at high redshift 
are described. In Sec. 3, the extragalactic objects in a cosmological context is presented, ana 
Sec. 4, contains our conclusions. 



-3- 



2. QSOs and AGNs features at high redshift 



In spite of some progresses obtained on the nature of the quasars, some subjects of 
them still remain open , such as: a qualitative test of quasar evolution through their spectra 
(jSegal &: NicoU I Il998l ) have shown that spectra of low and high redshift quasars are very 
similar. In the first order, there is nothing that distinguishes high redshift quasar from low 
redshift quasars. In addition, the observation of quasar APM 8279 +5255 with a redshift 
of ^ = 3.51 by ESA's XMM-Newton satellite Jflasinger et al.lbood ). had shown that iron 
was three times more abundant in the quasar than in our Solar System. If the redshift is 
indicative of distance, as an object formed to 13.5 x 10^ years ago (90 % of the age of the 
universe) can it contain 3 times more iron that the solar system only formed to only 5 x 10^ 
years ago?. Similar results has been found in recent studies based on quasar emission lines, 
the quasar environments are typically metal rich, with metallic ities near or above the solar 
value at even the highest observed redshifts (ISimon et al.l 120071 ) 



In the standard cosmology, the high redshift of the quasars is an indicator that they 
are between the most distant objects in the universe. They must, therefore, emit huge 
amounts of energy in order to be visible at such colossal vast distances, there is not a 
known mechanism to generate these colossal energy sources, because the thermonuclear 
source would be insufficient. In addition, due to their variability in luminosity on a variety 
of time scales, they must be relative small objects. A huge amount of matter in a small 
space might look like a black hole. Thus to explain the quasar source energy responsible 
of its high observed luminosity require to postulate that quasar and AGNs are powered by 
gravity. Super- massive blac k holes devouring large amounts of material organized in a thin 
accretion disk (JElvis Il2000l ). Even so, the profiles of emission line in the spectra of most 
quasars and AGNs are centrally peaked, telling us that only minor fractions of this light 
come from material at very high velocities. This sounds more like an amorphous cloud, or 
maybe a spherical distribution of clouds, than a thin, organized disk. Others problems arise 
with the super-massive black hole hypothesis, because a well accepted property of black 
holes is that anything that gets within a certain distance of the black hole's center, called 
the event horizon, will be trapped. Consequently, they cannot sustain a magnetic field of 
their own. But observations of quasar Q0957+561 (ISchild et al. II2005I ) situated 7.8 billion 
light years indicate that the object powering it does have a magnetic field. Those details 
suggest that the central object is not a black hole, for this reason, has been suggested that 
rather than a black hole, t his quasar contains someth ing called a magnetospheric eternally 
collapsing object (MECO) jRobertson fc Leiter \\20Q^ . 



In addition, if the quasar redshift is a distance indicator, this implies that objects 
like quasars with high redshifts must be superluminal objects, because the cosmological 



-4- 



dist ance per unit cosmic time (the so called recession velocity) in the FRW metric is given 
by (JDavis &: Lineweaver II2003I ) 



,{t,z) = —R{t) 



dz' 
Hiz' 



(1) 



where the expansion history of the universe is given by H{z). For a flat universe, there is 
the constrain condition for the cosmological density parameters asflM + f^A = 1 and H{z) is 
given by 

H{zy = Hi [(1 + zf^M + 1^a(1 + zf^'+^^] , (2) 

where Hq is the Hubble constant (?). Fig.l shows the velocity recession as a function of the 
redshift according to the standard cosmology. We have used the canonical cosmological pa- 
rameters, close to the found in the CMB WMAP data, VLm = 0.3, ^a = 0.7 and w = — 1 for 
the dark energy parameter. Fig.l shows also for comparison, the Special Relativity Theory 
(SRT) prediction and the cz approximation for the recession velocity. From this picture is 
possible to see that in the standard cosmology the velocity of recession is greater than c for 
z > 1.407. It is claim that this results is not a contradiction of special relativity theory, be- 
cause the SRT is valid only under a fiat Minkoski's space-time metric. Even so, the apparent 
magnitude of high redshift objects like supernovaes or quasars, rule out the SRT Doppler 



interpretation of cosmological redshift at a confidence level of 23a (JDavis fc Lineweaver 
20031 ). 



In astrophysics superluminal motion is seen as an ejection ofmass (plasma) forming 
jets in some galaxies, AGNs and QSOs. Rees has shown (JRees Ill966l ) that an object mov- 
ing relativistically in suitable directions may appear to a very distant observer to have a 
transverse velocity much greater than the velocity of light, consequently the superluminal 
motion will be only apparent. However, the superlumina l motion has been seen also in a 
local nearby (galactic) source (JMirabel &: Rodrigues Ill994l ). On the other hand, in order to 
explain the origin of the highest cosr nic rays and neutrino phys ics, has bean suggesting a 
possible Lorentz symmetry violation (jColeman fc Glashow Ill999l ). This means that at high 
energies the speed of a proton were higher (bigger than c). Then it turns out that the proton 
would lose energy to electromagnetic radiation, until its speed was the same as the speed of 
light. Thus, the Lorentz symmetry can not be a general symmetry of nature. 

On the other hand, the Gunn-Peterson trough in t he quasar absorption spec tra is recog- 
nised as a signature of intergalactic neutral hydrogen (JGunn fc Peterson Ill965l ). While, no 
such effect was visible in the spectrum of quasar with z < 6, implying that intergalactic 
hydrogen is practically all ionized up to a ver y high redshift. However, from about 2001, 
SDSS began to turn up quasars with z > 6 (JFan et al.l l2006l ). which did indeed show a 
Gunn-Peterson trough in their spectra. Thus, a redshift of about 6 seems to relate to the 



-5- 



re-ioni zation epoch. Whil e, analysis of the first year WMAP data on the polarization of the 
CMB (JKogut et al.ll2003l ) implies that, if reionization was a simple single-step process, it 
must have been completed at a much higher redshift, z = 17± 3, around ~ 65% higher than 
the value obtained with the quasar data (z ~ 6). Furthermore, a study of galaxies in the 
redshift range 5.7 — 6.5 (JMalhotra fc Rhoads II2004I ) has shown a value close to quasar data. 
According to this survey, the re-ionization was practically complete at z ^ 6.5. Recently, 
four quas ar above redshift 6 were discovered by the Canada-French High-z Quasar Survey 
(CFHQS) (jChriss et al. 1120071 ). The mean millimeter continuum fiux for CFHQS quasar is 
substantially lower than that for SDSS quasar at the same redshift and these new data 
suggest a reonization era at z > 6. 



3. Extragalactic objects in a cosmological context 



The publication of Bubble's article in 1929 (JHubble Ill929l ) is the birth of modern ob- 
servational cosmology. Hubble compared his distances to Slipher's measurements of redshift 
and made a famous plot, which today is called the Hubble diagram. Hubble diagram shows 
that a galaxy's redshift increases linearly with its distance from Earth. Under the assump- 
tion that the galaxy's redshift is due to the Doppler effect, the farther away a galaxy is, the 
faster it moves away from us, this tells us that the Universe is in expansion. 

Extensions of Hubb le 's work with spacec raft instruments, such as the Hubble Space 
telescope (Key Project) (JFreedman et al.ll200ll ). gives for the Hubble constant the value of 
h = 0.71 ±0.02 (random) ±0.06(s?/siematic). This large value for the Hubble constant when 
compared with its previous accepted value, suggests that beyond the nearby linear expansion 
of Hubble's law, the Universe expansion is accelerated. This acceleration suggests that the 
other ~ 70% of the universe is composed of a "dark energy" that must have a negative 
pressure to make cosmic expansion speed up over time. 



^However, a recent analysis also on the basis of the Hubble Space Telescope (jSandage et al. 

20061 ) has shown a discordant value to the Hubble's constant as h ^ 62, 12.7% smaller than 



the value obtained by Key Project. We argue here that these two differing values can be 
correct if we assume a fractal structure for the cluster of galaxies, because the assumed 
fractal structure is now well supported by observations. Looking into different directions of 
the sky, and using the same technique, is possible to obtain different values for the Hubble 
constant. The discrepancy increases, taking into account different methods to measure dis- 
tances. Measures of the Hubble constant, in the last decades of last century are framed in 
a strip of /i ~ 50 to /i ~ 90. The origin of these discordant values is probably due to the 
cluster of galaxies look like an infinitely replicated fractal structure. 



-6- 



Is it possible to conciliate the fractal structure with the homogeneity suggested by the 
linear Hubble law? So far this issue is still a matter of considerable deba te, such as the pres- 



ence of an eventual cross-over to homogeneity. It has been suggested (jjoyce et al. 1120001 ) 



that the fractal behavior is only a perturbation inside of a homogeneous universe, in which 
the leading homogeneous component is the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). 
However, the situation becomes controversial with the recent results on the anisotropy of 
the CMB , such as the North-Souther asymmetry, with a So uthern excess (in galactic coor- 
dinates) (JTegmark et al. I l2003l : IWibig fc Wolfendale I l2005l ) , s ometimes attributed only for 



the foreground. There is also gigantic voids in the CMB map (JRudnick et al. 1120071 ) identi- 



fied also in radio waves, the biggest void exceeds by far the size of known region of empty 
space and also the expectations of computer simulations. The so called axis of evil in the 
CMB, ini tially observe d in the COBE data as an alignmen t between the quadrupole and 
octopole (Lerner Ill995[) and also found in the WMAP data fide Oliveira-Costa et al. 112004 : 



Schwarz et al. 



2004; 



Land fc Magueijo 1 120051 ). This means that the universe is in fact ar- 



rayed around a special axis. If true, this behavior of the CBM constitute a challenge to the 
Cosmological principle. 

On the other hand, the SNIa supernovae are objects that appear when the mass of an 
accreting white dwarf increases to the Chandrasekhar lir ait and explode . The tight correla- 
tion of the luminos ity indicators, suc h as the Lp ~ Amis (jPhillips Ill993l ) and the multi color 
light curve shape (JRiess et al Ill995l ). justify the u se of SNIa as standard candles arid the y 
are used to constrain the cosmological parameters (jPerlmutter et allll999l : lRiess et alll2004j ). 
The disadvantage in using the SNIa for cosmological purposes is their limited redshift, up to 
z ~ 1.7. Most of them are situated below ^ < 1, At high redshift they are unobservable, due 
to the dust extinction in the intergalactic space. Therefore, in order to get more information 
in the high redshift re gion {z > 1), it is necessary to look fo r other brighter a stronomic 
objects such as GRBs ( jHurley et al.lll995l ). Quasar and AGNs (IStocke et al.lll992l ). 



In most cases, the Hubble diagram using quasars as cosmological objects, is presented 



only as a correlat ion between redshift and the apparent magnitude (JHewitt fc Burbidge 



19931 : iBasu II2003I ). because there is no direct information on quasars absolute magnitude. 
Even so, the Hubble plot of redshift against apparent magnitude is characterized by a large 
scatter. The absolute magnitude, called also as the quasar luminosity function, is derived 
from two observational parameters, the redshift (z) and the apparent magnitude (m), plus 
a cosmological model to obtain the so called luminosity distance {di). Thus in most cases 
the quasar luminosity function is given by 

M = m + 5-5\og{dL) -k + Amlz), (3) 

where k = — 2.51og(l + -z)^"", Am(z) is the correction to k taking into account the fact 



-7- 



that the spectrum of quasar is not strictly a power law as the form S oc z^^" with a = 0.5. 
Most of the studies of quasars, the luminosity distance di is determined using the Einstein 
de Sitter cosmological model where Qm = 1 and Hq = 50 km s~^ Mpc~^, he reafter called 



as Q model. However, there is also the A dominant flat cosmology (jOstriker I Il995l ) with 
Qm = 0.35, Qa = 0.65 and Hq = 65 km s~^Mpc~^, hereafter called as A model, and it 
is included also the so called standard cosmology model with Qm = 0.3, Qa = 0.7 and 
Hq = 70km s-'^ Mpc-^ . 

The present analysis on the quasar Hubble's diagr am is made using t he following data: 



(a) The First Bright Quasar Survey (FBQS) catalog (jWhite et al. Il2000l ) has a set of 636 
quasars distributed over 2682 deg"^. An efficient selection criteria on the basis of artificial 
intelligence methods has been used to select the fraction of FBQS candidates that turn 
out to be quasars. The accuracy of this classification, has been tested using fivefold cross- 
validation. Most of the selected objects in the FBQS sample have 80% of probability to be 
true quasars. Even so, the FBQS classified any object with broad emission lines as a quasar, 
there are no distinction between quasars and Seyfert 1 galaxies and quasars and broad lines 
radio galaxies. The absolute blue magnitude is given for objects with redshifts, and only a 
conventional cut at Mb = —23 was made. Of the 636 FBQS quasars, 50 so fall into this 
lower luminosity objects. The redshift for quasars and BL Lac objects in the FBQS sample 
were computed by cross-correlating the spectra with templates. The FBQS catalog includes 
radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars, the samples include also ~ 29 broad absorption line 
quasars and a number of new objects with remarkable optical spectra. In order to improve 
the uniformity of the samples, the quasars in the FBQS catalog were selected according 
to four criteria, including an extinction correction in the computed magnitude due to the 
Galactic latitude. 



^(b) The Fifth Data Release of the SLOAN DIGITAL SURVEY fSDSSl flAdelman-McCarthv et al 

20071 ) . It has mo re than 65,450 object s with luminosities larger than Mj = —22 (in a stan- 



dard cosmology) (ISchneider et al.ll2005l ). The catalog covers an area of SOOOdeg"^ and includes 
active galactic nuclei such as type II quasar, Seyfert galaxies and BL Lacertae objects. 

(c) The 9th Veron-Cety&Veron catalog, available in www.obs — hp.fr, includes 13214 
QSOs, 462 BL Lac objects and 4428 AGNs (of which 1771 are Seyfert 1). These objects 
have broad emission lines, brighter than absolute magnitude Mb = —23 under a model close 
to Q model. 

In Fig. 2 we show the apparent magnitude, t he so called PSF magnitude obt ained in 
the SDSS Release 5 photometric measurements (jAdelman-McCarthy et al.l 120071 ) against 
the redshift (top panel in Fig. 2). The figure includes (bottom panel Fig. 2) the absolute 
magnitude as obtained by the SDSS data plus the standard cosmology model {Qm = 0.3, 



Qa = 0.7 and Hq = 70km s~^Mpc^^). As is well known, these correlations show very 
large scatter. It is possible to observer (top panel) in the SDSS data a "duck beak" in the 
correlation between redshift and the apparent magnitude of quasars at 2; ~ 3 as a transition 
for a flat correlation. Or in other words, the apparent magnitude is consistent (statistically) 
with an almost constant value for z > 3, independent of the value of the redshift. 

In an attempt to improve the photometric accuracy and uniformity of the FBQS sam- 
ple, the apparent magnitudes were recalibrated plate-by-plate using magnitudes from the 
Minnnesota automated Plate Scanner POSS — I using a new limit of 17.8 in magnitude to 
redefine the complete sample. In addition, to improve the uniformity of the sample with 
Galactic latitude, an extinction corre ction was computed for each candidate object using the 
map of Schlegel (jSchlgel et al.lll998l ). In Fig. 3 (top panel) it is possible to observe that the 
scatter of the absolute magnitude vs the redshift in the FBQS sample is less than that in 
the VC&V sample shown in Fig.3 (bottom panel). In both samples, the Q model is used 
to obtain the absolute magnitude. A similar upside "duck beak" at 2; ~ 3 is also observed 
especially in the VeronSzVeron data as a transition for a flat correlation. This behavior 
is more clear in the lower picture because the VC&V sample extends to values of redshift 
bigger than in the FBQS sample. 

In order to extend the high quality FBQS sample for bigger values of redshift, other data 
taken from the literature were included, such as the biggest redshift quasar {z > 5.8) of the 
SDSS catalog (JFan et al.ll200ll ). In these quasars, the absolute magnitude has been derived 
from a selection function p(Mi45o,z), where M1450 is the apparent magnitude in the rest 
frame at 1450A, and is calculated using a Monte Carlo Simulation of quasar color, based on 
the quasar spectral model and the two cosmological models fl and A respectively. We have 
also included six new quasars {z ~ 6) selected from 260deg^ SDSS Southern su rvey, a deep 



imaging survey obtained by repeatedly scanning along the celestial Equator (jjiang et al. 



20071 ). where the absolute magnitude or luminosity quasar function is derived from quasar 
selection function of M1450 and z in the standard cosmological model. 

The analysis includes also moderate to high quality X-ray spectra of 10 of the most 
l uminous AGNs, at z > 4. Nine are from XMM-Newton observation and one is from Chandra 
( IShemmer et al.ll2005l ). where the apparent magnitude ABi^^q is measured and the absolute 
magnitude is derived on the basis of the standard cosmology with Qm = 0.3, Q\ = 0.7 and 
Ho = 70km s-^Mpc-^. 

Fig.4 shows the results of the apparent magnitude (central panel) and absolute mag- 
nitude (bottom panel) for quasars and AGNs respec tively. The open r ed-square data for 



z < 4 correspond to the quasars from FBQS catalog (jWhite et al 



2OOOI), and the absolute 



magnitude is derived using the Vt cosmological model. The data for z > b correspond to the 



-9- 



quasars from SDSS catalog (iFan et al.ll200ll ). and the absolute magnitude is derived using 
the Q and A model respectively. Finally, the solid red-square represent the X-ray AGN 
data, and the solid black-down triangles represent the SDSS Southern data respectively. In 
both cases, the absolute magnitude is obtained on the basis of the standard cosmological 
model. The top panel in Fig. 4 represents the magnitude modulus obtained as m — M and 
is close to the logarithm of the luminosity distance, the solid-black line and the dashed-red 
line represent the prediction of the standard model for two sets of cosmological parameters. 



4. Conclusions 

The high redshift objects such as QSOs, AGNs and GRBs open the doors for the study 
of the universe in another scale, the so called "high-z universe". So far, there are many 
controversial aspects on the nature of these high redshift objects. The difficulties lie in the 
fact that for instance the QSOs and AGNs searches are still quite inhomogeneous over the 
sky, and probably only large-scale automated surveys will be able to resolve this, and to 
answer some questions such as: Is there evidence of quasars occurring in the direction of 
nearby galaxies? Can such an excess be explained by something like gravitational lensing? 



Recently, the concept o f standard candle was ap plied to the GRB studies ( IShaeferl 12003 



20071 : iGhirlanda et al.ll2004l : iGhirlanda et al. II2006I ). In this approach the Hubble diagram 



and the cosmological parameters were obtained. It's claimed an agreement with the standard 
cosmology inside 2a to 3cr confidence level. The information that is obtained from GRBs 
is still dependent on the concept of standard candle. Even so, remarkable effort has been 
made to calibrate the GRBs and to place them in conditions to constrain the cosmological 
parameters. In addition, the statistic is still incipient in the high redshift region to reach a 
more robust conclusion. 

So far, QSOs, AGNs and GRBs have been observed with redshifts beyond 6. Unhappily 
up to now, the QSO and AGN luminosity function is a model dependent parameter. Even so, 
valuable information can be obtained starting from basically two observational parameters, 
the redshift, and the apparent magnitude. In this paper, we have made an independent 
analysis on the Hubble diagram of extragalactic high-z objects (QSOs and AGNs), on the 
basis of the more recent data as possible. 

It is possible to observer in the SDSS data a "duck beak" in the correlation between 
redshift and the apparent magnitude of quasars at z ~ 3 as a transition for a fiat correlation. 
Similar upside "duck beak" at ;z ~ 3 is also observed in the VeronSzVeron data, in the 
correlation between redshift and the luminosity function obtained using the Q model. In 



-10- 



addition the high quahty quasar FBQS sample, has been extended using the data of several 
X-ray AGNs. 

In general, the result for QSOs and X-ray AGNs at high redshift {z > 3) is a relative 
flat correlation between the apparent magnitude and redshift, as well as between the lumi- 
nosity function vs redshift, and that is reflected in the correlation between the magnitude 
modulus vs redshift. This result needs further confirmation, because the statistic of high 
redshift objects is still poor. If confirmed, this result is hard to conciliate with the standard 
cosmological model. 

This work is supported by the Brazilian National Council for Research (CNPq), under 
Grants No. 479813/2004 - 3 and 476498/2007-4. We are grateful to various QSOs and 
AGNs catalogs available on the web and to their open data policy, especially to Quasars 
FBQS, SDSS and V&V catalogs. For additional information on this work, please write to 
navia@if.uff.br. 



REFERENCES 

Adelman McCarthy, J. K. et al Preprint astro-ph/0707.3380 

Basu, D. 2003 J. Astrophys. Astr., 618, 271 

Burbidge et al. 1990 ApJ, 74, 675 

Coleman, S. & Glashow, S. L. 1999 Phys. Rev. D,59, 116008 

Chriss, J., et al. 2007 astro-ph/0706.0914 



Davis, T. M.,Lineweaver, C, H. Preprint astro-ph/0310808 

Dar, A. 1991 ApJ, 382, LI 

Elvis, M. 2000 ApJ, 545, 63 

Fan, X. et al. 2001 ApJ, 122, 2833 

Fan, X. et al. 2006 ApJ, 131, 1203 

Freedman, W., L. et al. 2001 ApJ, 553, 47 

Gehren, T„ Fried, J., Wehinger, P. A., & Wyckoff, S. 1984 ApJ, 278, IIG 



-11- 



Ghirlanda, G., Ghisellini, G., & Lazzati, D. 2004 ApJ, 616, 331 



Ghirlanda, C. M. et al, Preprint [astro-ph/0610248 

Gunn, J. E. & Peterson, B. A. 1965 ApJ, 142, 1633 

Hasinger, G., Schartel, N & Kommossa, S. 2002 ApJ, 573, L77 

Hewitt, A., & Burbidge, G. 1993 ApJS, 87, 451 

Hubble, E., P. 1929 Proc. Natt. Acad. Sci. USA 15, 168-173 

Hurley, J. et al. 1995 Nature, 372, 652 

Jiant, L. et al.. Preprint astro-pli/0708.2578 

Joyce, M., Anderson, P. W., Montouri, M. Pietronero, L., & Labini, S. 2000 Europhys, Lett. 
50, 416 

Kogut, A. et al. 2003 ApJ, 148, 161 

Land, K., & Majueijo, J. 2005 Pliys. Rev. Lett., 95, 071301 

Lehnert et al. 1992 ApJ, 393, 68 

Lerner, E., 1995 Astrophys. and Space Science, 227, 61 

Malhotra, S. & Rhoads, J. E. 2004 ApJ,617, L5 

Mirabel, L F. & Rodriguez, L. F. 1994 Nature, 371, 48 

de Oliveira-Costa, A. et al. 2004, Pliys. Rev. D,69, 063516 

live, K. A. & Peacock, J. A. 2006 J. Nucl. Pliys. G, 33, 210 

Ostriker, J. P. & Steinhardt, P. J. 1995 Nature, 377, 600 

Perlmutter, S., et al. 199 ApJ, 517, 565 

Phillips, M. M. 1993 ApJ, 413, L105 

Rees, M. 1966 Nature, 211, 468 

Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., & Kirshner, R. P. 1995 ApJ, 438, L17 

Riess, A. G., et al. 2004 ApJ, 607, 665 



- 12- 

Rudnick, L., et al. 2007 astro-ph/0704.0908 

Sandage, A. et al. 2006 ApJ, 653, 843 

Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998 ApJ, 500, 525 

Segal, L. E., & Nicoll, J. F. 1998, Proc. Natl. Sci. USA. Vol. 95, 4804 

Shaefer, B. E. 2003 ApJ, 583, 67 

Shaefer, B. E. 2007 ApJ, 660, 16 

Simon, L. E. et al. 2007 Rev. Mex. AA, 29, 177 

Schechter, P. L. 2004 Proc. lAU Sym. 225, | astro-ph/ 0408338| 

Schwarz, D. J. et al. 2004 Pliys. Rev. Lett. ,93, 221301 

Shemmer, O. et al., 2005 ApJ, 630, 729 

Schneider, D. P. et al. 2005 ApJ, 130, 367 

Robertson, S. & Leiter, J. 2003 ApJ, 596,2003 

Schild, R. E., et al. 2006 AJ, 132, 420 

Stocke, J. S., Morris, S. L., Weymann, R. J., & Foltz, C. B. 1992 ApJ, 396, 487 

Stockton, A. 1978 ApJ, 233, 745 

Tegmark, M. et al. 2003 Pliys. Rev. D, 68, 123523 

Wibig, T. & Wolfendale, A. W. 2005 Int. J. Moderm Phys.,29, 6612 

White, R. L. et al. 2000 ApJS, 126, 133 



This preprint was prepared with the AAS I^TJtjX macros v5.2. 



-13- 



10q 



1 - 



O 



o 

S3 



0.1 - 



0.01 



1 — I I I I nil 1 — I I I I nil 1 — I I I 1 1 III 1 — I I I 1 1 IN 1 — I I I 1 1 II 



•Standard Cosmology 



-- SRT 
cz 



~ I I I I I III I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 



0.01 



0.1 



10 



I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 



100 1000 



Redshift ( z ) 



Fig. 1. — Predictions for the recession velocity of astronomic objects as a function of the 
redshift: Sohd hne represent the standard cosmo logical model prediction, under the assump- 
tion of a flat universe. The Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is represented by dashed curve, 
and the dotted curve represent the cz approximation. 



-14- 



30 



^-25H 



CD 

H — ' 

o -30 H 

CO 

< 



~i 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 r 

SDSS Photometric Measurements 



"" 1 r- 




SDSS plus Standard Cosmology 
— \ 1 1 



1 



T" 
2 



3 



5 



Redshift ( z ) 



Fig. 2. — Top panel: the apparent magnitude, t he so called PSF magnitude obt ained in 
the SDSS Release 5 photometric measurements (jAdelman-McCarthy et al.l 120071 ) against 
the redshift. Bottom panel: the absolute magnitude as obtained by the SDSS Release 5 
photometric data plus the standard cosmology model {Qm = 0.3, fl/^ = 0.7 and Hq = 
70/cm s~^Mpc~^) against the redshift. 



-15- 





-18- 
-20- 
-22- 
-24- 


1 ' 


I'll 


1 




1 ' 




■ 




FBQS " 


-o 

"E 

CO 


;\. 




; 


o 
w 

< 


-26- 
-28- 
-30- 


■ ■■■.. 

■ 


- 




"iO 








-18- 
-20- 
-22- 


1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 
12 3 


1 ' 

4 £ 




1 1 1 ' 1 1 


1 ' 


1 ' 






■ 


v-c&v " 


CD 
T5 

-1— > 






- 


C 


-24- 
-26- 
-28- 
-30- 


MbSIB 


mba 




■ . — 

...■..■■■■■ 

■ 
■ ^ 


cc 

CD 

-1— > 




^^-v-'- -^^^^B 


■ ■ 

■ ■ 


3 

o 

< 


■ 
■ ■ 


■ .■ - ■ ■■■;.■ 




"^9 








•3d. ^ 


1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 
12 3 


1 ' 

4 I 








Redshift ( 


z) 







Fig. 3. — Top panel: the absolute magnitude vs the redshift in the FBQS sample. Bottom 
panel: the the absolute magnitude vs the redshift in the V&V sample. In both cases, the fi 
model has been combined with the data to obtain the absolute magnitude. 



-16- 



ID 
T3 
O 



CD 

T3 

ID 
^— » 

'c 



T3 

13 

'c 

CO 



C 

CO 
Q. 
Q. 
< 



CD 

•4— » 

o 

CO 

< 



50 
48 
46 
44 
42 
40 
38 
36 
34 



:a 



20- 



15- 



10- 



5 
-18-1 

-g -20 
."I -22 
^-24 



-26 
-28 
-30 
-32 








B 



-C 



"T" 





{£1^=0.3, £1=0.7, Hg=70 km s"' Mpc' ) 
(a^=1.0, a^=0.0, Hq=70 km s"' Mpc' ) 



2 



"T" 
3 



4 



~i — I — r~ 




n z<4 FBQS(White et al.(2000)) 

z>5SDSS(Fanetal.(2001)) 
■ X-ray AGNs(Shemmer et al.(2005)) 
▼ SDSS(Jiang et al.(2007)) 



-r 
2 



3 



-r 
4 



■y 
5 



-r 
6 




z<4 FBQS, z>5 SDSS (Model £l [ 
SDSS (Model A ) 
X-ray AGN (Standard Model) 
SDSS (Standard Model) 



:/ 



"T" 
2 



"T" 

3 



"T" 
4 



"T" 

5 



6 



Redshift ( z) 



Fig. 4. — Top panel: The magnitude modulus m — M obtained combined data with cos- 
mological models (see below). For comparison it is included the prediction of the standard 
cosmology model as sohd-black line and the dashed-red line for two sets of cosmological pa- 
rameters. Central panel: the apparent magnitude data of several samples and in the bottom 
panel, their absolute magnitude for quasars and AGNs respectively.